Ticia wrote:

flarequake wrote: I loved the desire-for-shoes passion in Phil's "NO COOL SHOES" tweet more than him ignoring the innuendo. I wonder which design he wanted. He likes colourful things so I thought the colourful ones in the middle, he already has endless plain white ones so I dunno if he'd go for the white pair with the gold.

He actually wanted a "boring" pair, but not the ones in the picture:

gnostic wrote:and can't even over how similar they look

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

gnostic wrote:and can't even over how similar they look

What, not really even at all?

Ticia wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

gnostic wrote:and can't even over how similar they look

What, not really even at all?

She really thinks it's them...awkward

Ticia wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

gnostic wrote:and can't even over how similar they look

What, not really even at all?

She really thinks it's them...awkward

achika wrote: re: the Dan interview that HAD to be scripted, at least 98% of it, I can't see Dan (or Phil, especially Phil) going into anything where they didn't know exactly what was going to happen. Especially when that fic part came up, he would've been outta there no question. Also is that Phil who's kidnapping him at the end?

And you can't talk about flirty 2009 Phil without talking about this video

I think my eyes fell out of my head the first time I saw that part.

bedhead91 wrote:

achika wrote: re: the Dan interview that HAD to be scripted, at least 98% of it, I can't see Dan (or Phil, especially Phil) going into anything where they didn't know exactly what was going to happen. Especially when that fic part came up, he would've been outta there no question. Also is that Phil who's kidnapping him at the end?

And you can't talk about flirty 2009 Phil without talking about this video

I think my eyes fell out of my head the first time I saw that part.

I don't recall ever watching this video....what's with the ouija board? Was Phil trying to fuck a ghost or what

sweetmm wrote:

bedhead91 wrote:

I think my eyes fell out of my head the first time I saw that part.

I don't recall ever watching this video....what's with the ouija board? Was Phil trying to fuck a ghost or what

starlight-still wrote:

bedhead91 wrote:

I think my eyes fell out of my head the first time I saw that part.

I don't recall ever watching this video....what's with the ouija board? Was Phil trying to fuck a ghost or what

Sometimes I really wonder what secrets lie within Phil's privated videos

I accidently typed "privates" when I was writing that it's like no, no too early to I was trying so hard

1.25

NarrysCanary wrote:

starlight-still wrote:

bedhead91 wrote:

I think my eyes fell out of my head the first time I saw that part.

I don't recall ever watching this video....what's with the ouija board? Was Phil trying to fuck a ghost or what

Sometimes I really wonder what secrets lie within Phil's privated videos

I accidently typed "privates" when I was writing that it's like no, no too early to I was trying so hard

[/Spoiler]

"was he trying to fuck a ghost"

and the video is not privated

1.25

karma_yeah wrote:Makes me wish 2009 Phil was touring. The video is less than 3 minutes long, low production, and little/no editing. He could be doing that on tour . . .
Phil, if you're on here (hear's nothing but the wind )

NarrysCanary wrote:and the video is not privated

1.25

First of all, his voice is softer and more northern-sounding so that alone is just I loved it when he said "satanist budgy torturer house."

Now that I see why he was pulling down his pants in context, it actually comes across as more innocent (even though, come on, dude, you're practically showing us *that* area) than I imagined. Actually, in a way, he seems very much the same. Sure, he learned a little something about punctuation and pacing and obviously upped his editing game as he got older but there's still a child-like wonder to 2009 Phil (I've decided that's what I'll call it rather than childishness). It's the way he talks- like an excitable seven year old telling you about his day- and his enormous eyes don't hurt the situation. Though I see that insecurity that was mentioned earlier too...there's this 'like me, please like me' kind of quality to it that he's lost as he's grown more confident.

This video actually seemed to echo his most recent Florida one quite a bit. There's the wtf-is-this-creepy-junk-in-our-house segment (OK, now that's creepy), the anecdotal segment and, of course, the nature appreciation segment. My opinion is, of course, biased since I am Phil whether we're talking 2009 or 2016 but the main difference I see is that in 2009 he talks more like his audience is around the same age as him and in 2016 he comes across as much more conscious of the age gap that exists with a large segment of his fanbase.

*Edit: Actually, another thing that I see is his current storytelling style seems to have been at least partially influenced by Dan's. That's one thing that came across even in their most recent ls. Phil tends to jump around quite a bit while Dan's more methodical about setting the scene and building out detail. Compare how he talks about the ant man in 2009 to his re-telling of the tale of the missing cab in 2016.

Oh. About those ants. I don't know about Florida but I do know that Texas has these little red fire ants that *will* bite your feet! So, beware if you're wearing sandals out there.

Ticia wrote:

(Favourited by Phil on Twitter).

Ticia wrote:People who say Dan's squishy haven't seen Phil's videos from 2008-2009

How did he go from this:



To this?

sorry ticia for editing your post, i made the second gif better quality

Ticia wrote:People who say Dan's squishy haven't seen Phil's videos from 2008-2009

How did he go from this:



To this?

Whatevenismyusername wrote:

Ticia wrote:People who say Dan's squishy haven't seen Phil's videos from 2008-2009

How did he go from this:



To this?

Omg Phil wearing a bow tie. Help I think I'm broken. He's always been so lovely, although I think I prefer his haircut previous to the current one, not at all a fan of the shaved look. Not that it changes much, still Phil

NarrysCanary wrote:

Whatevenismyusername wrote:

Ticia wrote:People who say Dan's squishy haven't seen Phil's videos from 2008-2009

How did he go from this:



To this?

Omg Phil wearing a bow tie. Help I think I'm broken. He's always been so lovely, although I think I prefer his haircut previous to the current one, not at all a fan of the shaved look. Not that it changes much, still Phil

I prefer his old haircut too but I guess the haircut he currently has is more adult than the one in the first picture