IDB has closed to discussion! To honor our many years of bants, we've archived the forum through November 2026. Thank you for everything! This was the most fun we ever had.
2016trashqueenspiderpearshaped34nessiemajitzulilMangokusunoki masashigedanphil333danisnotonphildaichiibluewhoannetamiauanathemaalittledizzyTiciaSquishPhanKathrynxjaneDaniel Howell & Phil Lester/viewtopic.php?t=406&start=750Dan & Phil Part 21: Say Howdy to InDepthBants (page 31)
Kathrynxjane wrote:The problem is that it is public knowledge and if you know where to look, it is easy to find. But it does say what their address on other forms is so I wouldn't be comfortable posting it on a public forum anyway.
As missemma said, you're welcome to just screencap the info and block out any identifying information.
I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
Honestly I don't think it's bad. Although I'm pretty sure most of the phandom (at least) suspects that they are rich, there are still some people who think they are selling books and stuff because they really need the money. Not saying they are greedy sellouts just because they are already loaded but it's good to put things in perspective.
majitzu wrote:Between me not knowing the english words and my poor knowledge about contability I don't understand anything xD
In summary: Dan and Phil be minted.
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
danisnotonphil The 'should we' aspect was already discussed, and decisions reached about what to include and what not to include.
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
sorry mom I'll stick to 'Top 10 Richest Youtubers' articles next time.
Seriously, though. Regardless of how you feel, this is public info. We've taken the liberty of excluding super personal information, so beyond that, you can't police what we discuss. I'm sorry, that's just how it is. You can disagree, but your attitude of "this is wrong because I say so" doesn't get you anywhere, really.
If you'd like to discuss something else.... discuss something else! It's as simple as that.
Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."
"Make no judgements where you have no compassion." -Anne McCaffrey
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
I feel the same. Even if it's not against the rules, it just feels wrong to me.
And we all know a lot of people are lurking, posting these things here draws attention to them. And when other people look for them and share them, they won't care if they link to their address or something...
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
If i said the site where you can get the information with their address and address of their accountant, then you have a right to be pissed. I didn't give any indication of how I got that information or their company number.
Like Ticia shows it is easy enough to Google and it comes up with figures like that. Anyone can do that for any company. You can do it for any Youtuber or person if they are a director of a limited company.
"You can't just pull it out and put it in without a plan." Dan Howell 2015
Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
I'm pretty sure the address given on the financial records is the accountants office and not D&Ps personal address. So for those who are concerned people will find their address and spread it about I don't actually think it's listed anywhere on those records.
the info is posted on a public site so anyone can access it, make emphasis on anyone. That's why it doesn't have super private information such as their exact address, we all know they are loaded tho so nothing really new there.
The only thing I might be mildly interested in is how much tatinof makes but I also hope the whole thing is old news by the timw they have to file it
danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
These are corporate financial details, not personal financial details. I understand that when it comes to Dan and Phil it might seem too personal since we consider them people not companies, but this information is still about their corporations - and corporate financial records are public and available to anyone.
danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
You do you, but you can't decide for me what is crossing the line and what isn't, I'll decide that for myself. I find these kind of things interesting, so will discuss them, you are not going to stop that.
I'm really curious how much they have made from the tour, I bet it's quite a lot.
danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
pal, friend, that information is p u b l i c and about c o m p a n i e s, it's there to be consulted at will, by everyone, and every fucking company has it, we don't need their fucking permission, we have the government's
oh no poor millionaires we're taking about how much money they make it's gonna ruin their lives how disrespectful
Dan Howell wrote:'[someone] just sent me a message saying 'Phil'..... same'
danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
You do you, but you can't decide for me what is crossing the line and what isn't, I'll decide that for myself. I find these kind of things interesting, so will discuss them, you are not going to stop that.
I'm really curious how much they have made from the tour, I bet it's quite a lot.
Well, the info will be public next year! And I'm sure it will be A LOT. Tour + books + documentaries. I can't even imagine a number.
Also, I don't really care how much they earn, I only want to know if they have a shared bank account. That's it.
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
While I get your point, you need to chill. It's not like someone posted their personal bank details. It's the financial statements from their private companies. And next time, you might have better luck if you didn't express your opinion in such an aggressive tone
danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
While I get your point, you need to chill. It's not like someone posted their personal bank details. It's the financial statements from their private companies. And next time, you might have better luck if you didn't express your opinion in such an aggressive tone
i agree with the person saying this wrong seeing as its illegal to post such documents without proper authority from the bank or the ppl in connection to said papers (im getting a law degree)
I'll stick to 'Top 10 Richest Youtubers' articles next time.
